Saturday, March 12, 2011

Here's sort of an interesting case where a jury concluded that a blogger had to pay damages because he helped get someone fired. The article could be a little more well-written, though, it doesn't explain very well why it wasn't libel/defamation (like one of the sources claims).

It's relatively rare for me to see a blogger held accountable for defamation and it raises some free speech issues.

No comments:

Post a Comment